Photography... It's all about the light, if there is no light there is no photograph. If you're at college studying photography, you're studying light as well and with 2 years of work free study surrounded by lecturers that are experts in the art of light you need to be leaving college with some basic knowledge of light.
It's usually the case on a level 3 course be it A-Level, UAL or BTEC there'll be some requirement at some point where you'll need to discuss your use of light and why you've made the choices that you have with regards the light.
So what decisions and knowledge should you identify when writing about it, analysing it and planning it?
(1). What is the light source and what are characteristics of that particular source. If it's an artificial source, is it trying to recreate something in nature... Sunlight or moonlight, reflected light, scattered light, fire light, dappled light, diffuse or point light?
(2). Direction - where's it coming from and why, why are you choosing to shoot in that particular light? What is it doing for your subject, is it moody, emotive, dramatic, objective, neutral?
(3). Does it flatten the subject or does it model the subject e.g. pick up the shape, form and texture, do you want it to do one or the other, if so why?
(4). Refracted, diffuse, reflected, specular, point?
(5). If it's an artificial facsimile of a natural form of light, how have you achieved it and how close have you been able recreate its properties and characteristics - be explicit in your explanations, draw floor plans and photograph the set-up.
(6). Colour of light http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/natural-light-photography.htm
(7). Lighting equipment - what did you use, why did you use it what are its pro's and cons.
(8). Inverse square law and its application in photography - how does it help you and why do you need to know about it, how have you used it?
(9). Reflected light - controlling light in the studio using zones and inverse square law.
(10). Artificial light sources, their characteristics and properties.
(11). Studio flash, modifiers, dishes, soft boxes, snoots, diffusing screens, reflectors, umbrellas all the equipment and its characteristics and properties.
(12). Studio space, heights, distances, widths and walls... why?
(13). Influence - whose lighting technique and style are you borrowing from, your analysis of their approach.
(14). Deconstructing and analysing other people's lighting using visual clues.
(15). Ratios - between highlight and shadow, masculine and feminine lighting.
(16). Masters of lighting - classic lighting techniques used by painters.
That's some of the easy stuff.
Use these prompts above and your notes from over the first year when all of this was covered, discussed and used in practice. (That's if you're on one of the courses I deliver).
Showing posts with label light. Show all posts
Showing posts with label light. Show all posts
Wednesday, 4 May 2016
Light - identifying it, writing about it as a technical aspect of your work in college projects.
Monday, 8 February 2016
The Prompts - Responding to and writing about images "Light".
This is an important one to always include as it
demonstrates your knowledge of how light is used. For this you need to look at
the light and judge whether the photographer has used available light, studio
flash, flash guns, daylight or a mixture of any of these or something
different? You should then write about the quality of the light in terms of it
being ‘diffuse’ or ‘Point’ light, discussing the impact this has on the image –
shadows, contrast, definition, flattening, vibrancy of the colour. Does the light
set the mood in the image; does it make the image look dark, sinister, bright
or happy? Think about and discuss the light in terms of other aspects of
photography you’ve previously learned about – does it look like another
practitioners (Photographers) lighting style, does it help with making image
look objective or subjective, is the light full of drama or is it neutral?
Say why you think the photographer has made these choices –
how relevant is the light to the image overall - is it inconsequential or
fundamental? Could the light be used differently – is the light consistent or
inconsistent across a series of images – think about the Becher’s for instance
all of their images had a uniformity by virtue of only ever making their images
when the light was of one specific type/quality.
With interior shots featuring people or objects, look at
where the light is falling, look at reflections in the eyes and other
reflective surfaces or objects – look for clues as to what kind of light has
been used? Is it simple or is it complex?
Labels:
a level,
about,
Analysing,
and,
AS,
BTEC,
college,
deconstruting,
describing,
in,
learning,
light,
lighting. studio,
making sense of,
Photography,
students,
UAL,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)